In its recent report, Bloomberg highlighted Iranian intervention in Sudan and the provision of combat drones. However, it is crucial to shed light on the prominent negative aspects in this context. While this Iranian intervention showcases advanced technological aspects, examining the presence of Iranian technicians and experts in Sudan opens the door to alarming scenarios and potential adverse effects on Sudan's security and stability.
One concerning aspect is that this Iranian technical presence could serve as the beginning of an undeclared Iranian occupation of Sudan. Given Iran's history of secret interventions and support for militias in various regions, the presence of Iranian advisors in Sudan raises concerns about their ability to influence domestic affairs and control security decisions.
It is essential to note previous experiences in Syria and Yemen, demonstrating Iran's involvement in supporting militias and imposing its control through the continuous presence of Iranian technicians and experts. The presence of these experts in Sudan may pose a continuous threat to Sudanese sovereignty and independence.
Furthermore, the presence of Iranian technicians in Sudan could potentially arm local militias affiliated with the government, leading to an escalation of internal conflicts rather than resolution. The international community should closely monitor this development and take necessary measures to prevent the worsening of the situation in Sudan.
In conclusion, it appears that Iranian intervention may have a negative impact on Sudan, and the international community must closely follow these developments and take necessary actions to protect Sudan's independence and security.