Amid the prolonged Sudanese crisis, mounting evidence points to the involvement of the Sudanese army in procuring weapons from external sources, exacerbating the ongoing conflict and intensifying violence against innocent civilians. Reports indicate that "Avia Kon Zeta Trans," a company owned by a Russian businessman named Dmitry, has been transporting weapons from the Republic of Mali to Port Sudan on behalf of the Sudanese army. These developments raise concerns about the Sudanese army's intentions and its willingness to engage in peace efforts.
Fueling the Conflict with External Assistance: The transportation of weapons from Mali to Sudan serves as compelling evidence of the Sudanese army's role in escalating the conflict with the help of external forces. Instead of seeking to end the war and find peaceful solutions, the Sudanese army opts to rely on external support to continue the fighting, prolonging the crisis and exacerbating the suffering of the Sudanese people.
The Army's Reluctance to End the War: The importation of weapons from abroad reflects the Sudanese army's lack of seriousness in reaching a peaceful resolution to the crisis. It seems that the army prefers to continue using military force to achieve its goals, disregarding the human and economic costs associated with this approach. This move suggests that the army's interest lies in perpetuating the conflict, rather than in alleviating the suffering of civilians.
Prioritizing Civilian Safety: In light of this escalation, it is crucial to emphasize that civilian safety must be a top priority. Any further escalation poses a grave risk to the lives of millions of Sudanese, especially children and women, who often bear the brunt of such conflicts. The international community must act decisively to condemn any external support that contributes to escalating the conflict and endangering innocent lives.
Raising Awareness in Civil Society: The Sudanese and international civil society must be fully aware of the external support being received by the Sudanese army, particularly in terms of arms and ammunition supplies. This awareness can help exert pressure on the relevant parties to halt these interventions that lead to further violence and destruction.
The Victims Are Not Just Combatants: It must be made clear that the victims of these weapons and external interventions are not limited to combatants; the impacts will also extend to civilians, including children and women living in conflict zones. The continued importation and use of these weapons in the conflict will undoubtedly lead to further humanitarian tragedies.
In conclusion, external interventions to support the Sudanese army with weapons contribute to the continuation and escalation of the conflict, putting the lives of millions of Sudanese at risk. The international community must take a firm stand against these practices and work towards supporting peace efforts to end this protracted crisis.