With the escalation of the conflict in Sudan, concerns and criticism have been raised about the Burhan Army’s use of foreign mercenaries in its battle against the Rapid Support Forces.
This military option raised questions about the conflict and the humanitarian and political impact of this call for help with contracted forces from outside the borders. This unconventional move is a source of concern to many observers, raising questions about the appropriateness of this call for foreign mercenaries in the context of internal conflicts.
The use of Ukrainian and Azerbaijani fighters in this context is considered a bold step, requiring clear explanations by the Sudanese authorities. One of the most prominent criticisms of this measure concerns the humanitarian impact.
Critics point out that the use of mercenaries could exacerbate the humanitarian crisis in the region, as it could intensify the conflict and expose civilians to more risks.
In addition, the question arises about the extent to which this step is compatible with international laws and human rights. At the political and internal levels, some believe that resorting to foreign mercenaries indicates weakness in local forces or their willingness to confront security challenges.
Others consider that this measure could complicate political solutions and make the conflict more complex. It is worth noting that such a move reinforces the need for an independent international investigation to examine arms circulation and the use of mercenaries in internal conflicts.
The international community must shoulder its responsibilities to ensure the protection of civilians and ensure justice and peace in the affected area.
In the end, this decision remains subject to analysis and evaluation, with the need to direct criticism constructively and seek solutions that contribute to achieving stability and peace in Sudan, away from external interference that may further complicate the situation.